When
common households park large portions of savings in gold and silver, it is
mostly non-productive for the economy. At scale, it slows industrial growth,
credit creation, and innovation.
But there’s a why, a when, and a limit to when metals do make sense.
1.
Why are precious metals economically “unproductive”
Gold
and silver:
- Do not create jobs
- Do not generate
cash flow (no dividends, no interest)
- Do not expand
productive capacity
- Sit idle in lockers, cupboards, or vaults
From
an economic systems view:
They
store value but do not circulate value
When
millions of households do this simultaneously:
- Banks receive fewer
deposits
- Less capital is
available for industry, MSMEs, and infrastructure
- Credit growth slows
- GDP growth loses
momentum
This
is especially relevant in capital-hungry developing economies.
2.
The “blocked flow” problem (this is key)
Money
has economic velocity.
- ₹100 in a bank →
loan → factory → wages → consumption → taxes
- The same ₹100 in
gold → zero velocity
When
savings shift from: productive financial assets → inert physical assets
The economy experiences:
- Liquidity
tightening
- Higher borrowing
costs
- Slower industrial
expansion
So yes—at scale, metal hoarding indirectly suppresses growth.
3.
Then why do common people still choose gold?
This
is where human psychology and institutional trust come in. People choose
gold because:
- It is a default
safe, not because it is productive
- Protection against
inflation and currency erosion
- Distrust in:
- Market volatility
- Corporate
governance
- Policy consistency
- Financial literacy
gaps
So gold investment by households is often: A symptom of systemic mistrust, not economic wisdom.
4.
Important distinction: Individual vs Economy
Here’s the subtle but critical line:
For
an individual
- Gold = insurance,
not growth
- Small allocation
can stabilize wealth
- Acts as a psychological and financial safety net
For
an economy
- Excessive household
gold accumulation = capital stagnation
- Long-term drag on
productive sectors
Both statements can be true simultaneously.
5. When gold & silver do make sense
Metals
are justified when used as:
- 5–10% risk hedge,
not core investment
- Inflation shock
absorber
- Crisis buffer (geopolitical, currency collapse scenarios)
They
become harmful when:
- They replace
long-term productive assets
- They dominate household savings culture
6. The deeper structural issue (often ignored)
If
people trusted that:
- Industry is fair
- Markets are
transparent
- Policies are stable
- Savings will not be
silently eroded
Gold
demand would naturally decline, so the real solution is not “discourage gold”,
but:
- Strengthen
productive investment channels
- Improve financial
literacy
- Ensure
inflation-adjusted real returns
- Build long-term trust in institutions
7.
Refined statement
“Household investments in precious metals
preserve value but do not create value. When adopted at scale, they reduce
capital circulation, limit industrial financing, and indirectly slow economic
growth—especially in developing economies.”
That’s
a balanced, defensible, and mature position.
#Mustread #Trending #Education #ValueforMoney #Viral #Mostviral
